Inclusive Behavior, Not Words
I read a story about a preschool that banned the use of the term “best friend.” What they were trying to accomplish was to avoid having other children feel excluded. While the goal was commendable, the approach was questionable. At least one parent objected publicly to the new rule, stating that she wanted her daughter to be able to express her strong feelings for a friend. That’s a good point.
While this story appears to have nothing to do with autism, children with autism and their families certainly know a thing or two about feeling excluded. What struck me as questionable was the school’s focus on WORDS to avoid having children feel excluded. What would have been a better approach, in my humble opinion, would have been to focus on inclusive BEHAVIOR. Sadly, I have witnessed too many examples of organizations undertaking substantial efforts to ensure that the language they use is inclusive while failing to ensure that their conduct is equally welcoming. Sometimes, I feel that controlling and altering the “words” is worse than doing nothing at all. Why? Because it allows these organizations to “check off the box” and feel that they have fully addressed the issue. Let’s make sure to send the message that inclusive words are worthless without accompanying inclusive behavior.
apc18 • Post Author •November 12, 2018
This a comment made by a user.
Virginia SkarFebruary 18, 2019
This reminds me of one of my favorite Ghandi quotes–>“An ounce of practice is worth more than tons of preaching.” Children feel they belong when behavior and culture SHOW them this on a daily basis. No language mandate can replace this.
froleprotremMay 13, 2020
It is truly a great and helpful piece of info. I am satisfied that you simply shared this helpful info with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.
frolep rotremMay 15, 2020
I conceive this internet site has some real fantastic information for everyone : D.